Ur'^lfy^ 97% . AX-e^-vi.A^ t^ iC, ^ ^ PSYCHIC TREATMENT OF NERVOUS DISORDERS THE PSYCHIC TREAT- MENT OF NERVOUS DISORDERS :: :: :: :: [The Psychoneuroses and Their Moral'' Truatment^ By DR. PAUL DUBOIS Professor of Neuropathology at the University of Berne TRANSLATED AND EDITED Br SMITH ELY JELLIFFE, M.D., Ph.D. Visiting Neurologist City Hospital ; Instructor in Materia Medica and Therapeutics, Columbia University, New York AND WILLIAM A. WHITE, M.D. Superintendent Government Hospital for Insane, Washington, D. C; Professor of Nervous and Mental Diseases, Georgetown University, Washington, D. C; Professor of Mental Diseases, George Washington University, Washington, D. C. SIXTH EDITION, REVISED FUNK ^ WAGNALLS COMPANY NEW YORK AND LONDON 1909 V . I* » • • • •' IfOf fcSQLOGt LIBRARY G StOLOGr LIBRARY 4 (^H^^J^ ^ i. Copyright, 1909, by I^UNK & WAGNAI^LS COMPANY [Printed in the United States of America] First Edition, Published July, 1905 Sixth Edition, Revised, Published April, 1909 B^ INTRODUCTION TO THE SIXTH AMERICAN EDITION My book has been well noticed by reviewers, and has had an encouraging reception both from the best physicians and from the public at large. Although my views on psychological treatment may have left indifferent, or even shocked, certain professors who were fixed in their dogmatic views, they have found many warm supporters among experienced practitioners in towns and country who know so well how to keep up with the times. A second German edition of the book appeared at the same time as the third French edition. The excellent English translation published in New York from the pen of Dr. Smith Ely Jelliffe and Dr. William A. White has also found numerous readers, being now in its sixth edition. This means that the ideas here set forth are in the air, and that in attempt- ing to epitomize them in didactic form I have done nothing more than express concisely the thoughts of many of my confreres of different countries. This was my object, and the support they have given me in letters, their reports to medical journals, and personal conversations I have had with them constitute a much-valued encouragement. It would have been astonishing had the approbation been unanimous, and it is my duty to reply to various objections and criticisms that have been made of me. Some have insinuated that I may have exaggerated what one calls "the influence of the mind over the body" and have shown from a therapeutic standpoint a too great optimism. An esteemed colleague, who is both a physician and a littera- teur of note. Dr. Chatelain, expressed his reservations in these terms: "It is perfect, but are neurasthenic persons intelligent enough to understand, and sufficiently sensible to follow the advice of the doctor and submit to his orders? My excellent vi INTRODUCTION colleague seems to have no misgivings, and I hope his work will always lie on such good firm ground. But my experience — a long one, too — makes me, alas ! much less positive. Hippocrates says, 'Yes.' Galien says, 'No.' And it is still like this in the twentieth century. Perhaps Galien doesn't know how to be sufficiently persuasive !" Well, yes, Galien is not sufficiently persuasive, and Hippo- crates will have to be still more so. Dr. Chatelain is an alienist; he is thoroughly familiar with the psychoses he has observed in the asylum; he has seen to advantage the close relationship they bear to the psychoneu- roses. His prognosis has remained somewhat severe, although he has always known how to use his great personal, intellectual, and moral influence for the good of his patients. As a doctor of the nervous I observed at the beginning of my medical career minor psychopaths, neurasthenics, psychas- thenics, hysterics, hypochondriacs in the making, and hypomel- ancholiacs. It was only later that I arrived at the "frontier," so to speak, of "madness," that region so badly marked. My views on the prognosis have naturally been influenced by this inverse education. Painful experiences have certainly made me recognize incurable psychoneuroses ; they have helped me to evolve various forms of morbid insanity which before I had only recognized as ordinary neurasthenia. I have been able to rectify some tardy mistakes, and, now that I have thirty years of experience behind me, I am tempted to become a Httle more pessimistic. However, as far as my patients are concerned, I shall always force myself to combat this paralyzing pessimism. In theory, we should be skeptical and not afraid of pessimistic predications ; in practise, it is a good thing to believe what one wishes to believe, for the conviction d'arrive is the first condi- tion of success in all walks of life. But the optimism I extol does not have its source in a natural desire to cure patients at all costs ; it is founded on experience. All that I have seen in these last years has shown me that my faith in psychotherapeu- tics is not yet sufficiently alive, sufficiently a part of myself. I am astonished with what facility it is possible to correct per- INTRODUCTION vii verted faculties, to restore to clear thought, to a sane philoso- phy of life, people who for thirty or forty years have been under fatal illusions concerning their psychical and physical health. It is very hard indeed to influence the mentality of the masses when one is addressing humanity as a whole, either by word or letter. When we are listening to the sermon of a moralist pi^acher, we are apt to seize at once on the criticism that accommodates itself to our neighbor instead of acknowl- edging our own faults and reforming our conduct. The poor harvests gleaned by the moral ethics either of church or laity are not encouraging. The attempt is just as arduous — we may say often as impos- sible— when we attempt to convince adversaries, to bring them over to our religious, political, social, or even scientific views. They oppose us with a vigorous obstinacy, for they have no direct interest in abandoning their ideas to ours. The situation is entirely changed when it concerns a sick person who is suffering and who appeals to us to find the solace or the cure. If in this case one succeeds in showing the patient that his mentality, his accidents of pyschology and character, play an important part in forming the nucleus and development of his illness, that a mental reform is necessary before he can be cured, then we have before us a zealous pupil who becomes a disciple under the pressure of his own personal interest. However little endowed he may be intellectually, he will recognize the dangers of pusillanimity, of discouragement. It is easy to show him that he exaggerates his ills through fear, that he even gives birth to them. The primordial failing of all these psychasthenics is fear; the native sensitiveness of the neurasthenic develops into ponophobia; there is an element of fright in the subconscious ideas of the hysteric ; psychasthenics are tormented by innumerable illusions ; they reach a condition of panphobia and approach phobophobia. The hypochondriac of every kind is afraid of disease, and the melancholiac is also obsessed with fixed ideas of ruin, disgrace, and incurability. In attributing to the psychoneuroses four characteristics, exaggerated suggestibility, sensitiveness, impressibility, and emotional hysteria, I could have said, "All these have their viii INTRODUCTION origin in fear." Fear creates dependence on others, the desire for direction, consequently for suggestibiHty ; it engenders an unwilUngness for the sHghtest exertion; it opens the flood- gates of emotion. It is not sufficient with psychoneuroses to fight the crisis by physical and psychical means, by the removal of the particular cause ; it is necessary to prevent the recurrence of attacks by making the primary mentality less sensitive. I maintain that this attempt is easier than one thinks, especially if one restricts this education to ideas useful in the conduct of life. It is on this point that I differ from Janet and from many of those who to-day have recourse to what they call psycho- analysis. Having shown my aversion to artificial methods, I shall return to the question of hypnosis and suggestion. The ac- quaintance of one's patient is made through an intimate friendly conversation — thus is the psycho-analysis of which men have always made use in their reports. I am not in any way opposed to Janet's education of the mind, but I would like to see less psychology and more ethics. There is no doubt that it is a good thing to create in these patients the practise of mental synthesis, and for this any exercise is good; but it is above all important to give them confidence in themselves and to bring them to fight against irrationalism, to teach them to be their own masters. This purely moral instruction is suitable for those whose intellects are very limited and whom one could not even bring to write a composition or make a calculation. Let my colleagues take this path, and they will see that I have not exaggerated matters, and that the psychotherapeutic will find the neurasthenic sufficiently intelligent to understand him, sufficiently reasonable to follow his advice, provided he has a little of that optimistic courage, that persistent conviction, which believes in the "sweets of persuasion." Many doctors wish at all costs to justify with suggestion the influence which I have over my patients. Bernheim, in particular, has attempted in a series of publications to defend his work, by confounding suggestion and persuasion. His claims to priority are unjustified, since our methods are not only different but opposite. Here is a misunderstanding which INTRODUCTION ix is mainly due to the fact that we have taken different roads. The illustrious professor of Nancy was initiated into hypnosis by Liebault. With an acuteness of psychological analysis that I have always admired, he has been able to recognize that hyp- nosis is nothing more than persuasion. He was very quick to see that he could dispense with this preliminary sleep, and he has practised chiefly suggestion on awaking. Lastly, he has very often had recourse to the old method, to persuasion pure and simple; he has passed over successively the three stages: hypnosis, suggestion on waking, and persuasion, and he seems to admit that those who favor the last ought to have followed the same course. In his opinion, I would, so to speak, have disowned my mother, in extolling rational psychotherapeutics in opposition to suggestion. I must protest, my development having taken an entirely different course. As a practising physician, I began before the experiments at Nancy to influence my patients by bona-fide persuasion. The study of books by Bernheim and the visit I paid him in 1888 made me realize the power of hypnosis and of suggestion. I was amazed by his demonstrations, and for a few months I even made use of his methods, but I recognized immediately their artificial character, and I abandoned them to strike the path where I had left it, the path of rational psychotherapeutics. I know well how Bernheim avoids his difficulties. On his own responsibility, he changes the sense of words and defines suggestion according to what idea he has in his head. In this case, it is very evident that all mental therapeutics have their origin in suggestion and that persuasion is only a particular form of suggestion. Here we have an ingenious paralogism, destined once and for all to clear hypnosis and suggestion of the reproach of irra- tionalism. The means men have always adopted in order to come to a mutual conviction is called simply persuasion. It is arrived at by proof, for it is also possible by experience and demon- stration to prove things in medicine. Persuasion is practised by affirmation, pure and simple, which can never come under the head of suggestion if one believes oneself in what one is affirming. X INTRODUCTION Suggestion is nothing more than a form of persuasion, and I refute it for the precise reason that it is artificial, ilhisive; that it arrives at its conclusion by surreptitious means. When Bernheim says to a patient suffering from headache, "I am not going to send you to sleep; I simply want to take away your headache and giddiness," he deceives his patient by a statement he does not believe. He knows very well that an application of the hands can not, per se, dissipate the molecular disorders which cause the headache and giddiness. He makes the patient believe that his headache is going to pass away, and it is from the psychological action that he expects the effect of sugges- tion. The idea of the patient in this case is different from that of the physician; the former believes in a real, psychological influence, the latter knows that he is working on the imagina- tive faculties of his subject. I doubt very much whether Bern- heim, supposing one day he had a headache, would come and ask me to put my hand on his forehead. When I made the little set speech, "Wait, this gentle warmth will cure you," he would give me one of his malicious glances and say, ''We know all about that ; that is for our patients, but not for us." The method would often succeed, I know, but I will not permit myself to apply it, even if it means that my patient must suffer from headache a little longer. I am not at all anxious to juggle with this commonplace symptom in the same way that I never try to dissipate a semi- anesthesia by a transfer, a subterfuge which consists in mispla- cing the limits of insensibility by suggestion. I wish, on the contrary, to study my patient, discover by what circuitous route he has arrived at pains in the head, by what conscious or sub- conscious autosuggestion he produces sufferings or anesthesias. I would like to free him of his autosuggestibility, and for that reason I do not think it is a good plan to cultivate his sugges- tibility or credulity. His headache, perhaps, will last longer ; he will take longer to lose his insomnia, his insensibilities ; he will give me more trouble than if I forced some therapeutic suggestions into his head ; but he will become reasonable, capable of a mental syn- thesis, and when he comes out of the clinic he will not only INTRODUCTION xi have left behind a morbid suffering, an anesthesia, and a dis- order of the functions, but will also have acquired a spirit of resistance which will reestablish his psychical and physical equilibrium, and will protect him against relapses, even if un- fortunate circumstances continue to introduce those specific causes which gave birth to the crisis. To employ persuasion is to imbue one's patient with an idea which one believes in oneself, to communicate a convic- tion which one holds completely, to offer him a psychological treatment that one would apply to one's best friend, or even to oneself. If I say to an insomniac, "Don't look for sleep; it flies away like a pigeon when one pursues it; suppress by a sane philosophy the futile preoccupations that possess you, end the day with a single thought that will invite the sleep of the just and the tranquil," it means that on a night when I can not sleep I am ready myself to profit from this advice which, although it may be for a long time ineffective, is always sound. To employ suggestion is to capture, either entirely or in part, the confidence of the subject, to set before him an idea that I have no doubt could cure him, but that has not the same form in the mind of the patient as in that of the physician. Here we have a professional lie, a justifiable lie, to which I would only have recourse in the event of my bona-fide methods of persuasion not succeeding. I have never found myself in this situation. I create between persuasion and suggestion all the differ- ence that exists between a good piece of advice and a practical joke. Both can obviously produce in the subject the desired reaction; but I have recourse to suggestive methods only in very rare instances, for the sake of rapidity, as in the case in which one prescribes a draught that is merely capable of pro- ducing an effect on the imagination. It is sometimes excusable, but it is not conscientious. In conclusion, I must draw attention to a fact that is by no means rare. The patient, by virtue of his very suggestibility and credulity, is capable of undergoing a genuine suggestion when it is the physician's object to confine himself to the path of mere persuasion. The patient has not completely under- xii INTRODUCTION stood ; he has not followed his curer through the details of his psychological demonstration; he has not grasped the moral advice; he has, without knowing it himself, yielded to mere physical suggestions. You effect your cure. It is the patient who brings it about, happy often to bursting point at the rapidity of the recovery, fatal in itself, since it is the result of a suggestibil- ity which it should have diminished. I have often criticized my pupils when they have gleefully told me of the results obtained in a seance on some patients whom I had confided to them, and I have written : "Take care, you wished to make use of persua- sion, but your patient, psychasthenical and credulous, has suc- cumbed to an ordinary suggestion. Make the most of the good results, but remove your patient from the dangerous epitome and set him on the broad path of rational thought." I hope I have succeeded in showing in these few lines what a difference there is between methods of suggestion and rational psychotherapeutics. This medecine de V esprit is still in its embryo. It is some- times laughed at, and people pretend that it has always existed. It is perfectly true that there have always been physicians who have used moral influence; but an abyss still exists between that verbal encouragement which reassures the patient, incul- cates him with the idea of cure, and the psychotherapeutics of to-day. Like Janet, we must analyze the psychology of our patient, classify the phenomena, stating precisely the symptoms of the neurasthenic, hysteric, and psychasthenic conditions. Without forgetting the physical causes, we must look for the influence of mental illusions in the development of hypochondria, of melancholia, and of more serious psychoses, such as systema- tized delirium. Far from being ready for the harvest, the field has scarcely been sown. Happily, in medicine, practise in its gropings often gets ahead of theory, which is always somewhat elusive. In spite of the obscurity which still dominates this subject of psychopathy, it is averred that a psychotherapeutic treat- ment, based on the rational education of the mind, in the ethical sense, is capable not only of suppressing the accidents of path- INTRODUCTION xiii ology, but also of reforming to a large extent the primitive mentality, which is the constitutional cause of a breakdown aggravated by specific developments. To-day Bernheim and his pupils, who formerly cured so many ills by suggestion, declare that the different forms of neurasthenia are not amenable to psychotherapeutics, which depends on the amount of autosuggestion it comprises.^ This lack of success on the part of suggestive therapeutics, erroneously termed psychotherapeutics, does not astonish me at all. It is hysteria, which is entirely a product of autosugges- tion, and yields the most readily to brutal force, to that per- verted psychical influence which is called suggestion. Neu- rasthenia requires an altogether different kind of psychothera- peutic treatment, a moral education which does not attempt to spirit away fatigue, but makes it disappear little by little by suppressing the primary cause, emotionalism. Of course this treatment can not be completed in a day, as in the case of imaginary ills, self-intimated ; its action is slower, since it attempts to recreate in the patient ethical notions, with a view to restoring his lost energy. I do not hesitate in affirm- ing that suggestive methods are insufficient for curing neuras- thenia, but a careful orthopedia, which changes the point of view of the patient, is the most effective weapon. Before one makes the statement that this is not the case, one must first have essayed it. One word in conclusion: Several of my colleagues, from different countries, have given me the privilege and pleasure of a visit, and in the many friendly interviews we have had together they have become familiarized with my views. The success of those practitioners who have often confided their patients to me has been undeniable, and this success has been due not to sleep, to the administration of drugs, or to isolation, which as I have said I do not employ now except in serious cases, but to moral treatment. Many have under- stood it clearly, and are ready to apply it, although they may be somewhat afraid of the difficulties of such a delicate task. 1 '' Neurasthenies et psychonevroses,'' by Dr. Bernheim, professor in the Faculty of Medicine at Nancy. Paris: O. Doin, 1908. xiv INTRODUCTION I have provoked in others a smile, sometimes friendly, sometimes skeptical. They have insinuated that I am mistaken in the nature of my influence in attributing it to my dialectic and have exclaimed : ''Your successes are due to your personal influence; it is of the suggestive order, however just may be your criticism of hypnosis and of suggestion properly so called." Here is the crux of a regrettable confusion. The persua- sive influence is complex; it influences by the appeals of pure reason and by those of sentiment. But it must also be remem- bered that these sentiments are logical. What is the difference between obeying a physical suggestion and appealing to an experienced physician whose success one knows in certain cases and who has been recommended to you? What is the differ- ence between being credulous and open to suggestion, and of being able to recognize in a physician, at the first interview, a competency in his subject, being able to have confidence in his good will, his patience, and his kindness? Here are some good sound reasons to hope for a cure, to possess, not that blind faith which will make the patient the slave of his curer, but that rational confidence which will throw the gates of common sense open to a straightforward dialectic. Yes, these senti- mental reasons are to be found everywhere, and I have shown (in Chap. X), the often fatal role they play in psychology when our credivity passes the boundary and approaches, through the medium of credulity, a commonplace suggestibility. But a sentimental dialectic does exist ; that is to say, a con- tention that reason can control our sentiments does recognize the legitimacy of some and the absurdity of others. If one excepts the wholly animal passions, where sentiment is nothing but the expansion of a desire, all our sentiments begin by a mental representation of an intellectual order, open in conse- quence to reason. I become the victim of a fatal suggestibility when I let myself be mastered by a good talker, allow myself to be carried away by his eloquence, without perceiving that he is an egotist, a poseur, that he influences me to thoughts and deeds of which my reason disapproves. I abandon myself, on the other hand, to a salutary persua- INTRODUCTION xv sion when I accept the views of a person who is dear to me, when I notice how his conduct harmonizes with his principles, when I appreciate both the logic of his reasonings and the convincing fervor with which he persuades others to believe in them. Self-education ought precisely to lead us to this moral clair- voyance which suspends the impulsion of a sentimental motive until the moment when sane common sense has given its con- sent. It is precisely this mastery which we ought to teach our patients to make them less open to suggestion and more open to reason ; to snatch them from the clutches of autosuggestions or of outside suggestions that may do them harm. The exer- cise of reason alone can produce this perspicacity. Reason instructs, not indeed with a mathematical logic, but with that ethical dialectic which made the Greek philosophers say, impregnated as they were with intellectualism, "Virtue is knowledge." And this is the reason why we have to teach this mastery of oneself, if we would cure patients who are all suffering, in some degree or other, under different forms from an evident psychasthenia. To acquire this education, we must have a profound sympa- thy for those who suffer, a complete sincerity, and so obvious a conception of our subject that our exposition of it may be obvious too. PAUL DUBOIS. Berne, Switzerland, March, ipop. TRANSLATORS' AND EDITORS' PREFACE The preparation for the American public of a translation of Professor Dubois's "Les Psychoneuroses " has been undertaken with the conviction that its publication in this country would be particularly opportune at this time, when the effect of the mental representations upon the bodily conditions is attracting so much attention here, and when the problems connected with it are being attempted from so many and such varied points of attack. It is a question as alluring as it is baffling, and it is not easy to preserve toward it an attitude at once open and balanced. Such an attitude, however, Professor Dubois has maintained from the start, and to it he owes the exceptionally convincing quality of his work. Whether in the opening chapters, where he discusses the fundamental philosophy underlying the position which he holds, or in the latter portion of the book, where he describes so clearly and charmingly the exact methods by which he has won such notable success, this sane and tranquil attitude is obvious. It is difficult to see how one who accepts the well- nigh axiomatic premises with which the author sets out can avoid accompanying him quite to his conclusions, so logical and inevitable is his progress. By the time we reach the specific instances which illustrate the power of " moral ortho- pedics," of *' persuasion," and of " education of the reason," the successes chronicled there seem to the reader, as to the author, the inevitable result of the " psychotherapy " which he practises. The strong, optimistic tenor of the book, its simple, un- technical language, and the directness with which its phi- losophy is applied to life, make it capable of becoming a vital fact, not merely to physicians, but to every one who has pon- dered on the relations between the psychic and the physical — to every one, indeed, who honestly desires to keep down the xviii TRANSLATORS' AND EDITORS' PREFACE sum total of needless suffering in the world. That psychic disorders require psychic treatment, that many distressing and dangerous nervous disorders are purely or primarily psychic — these are the theses for which the book contends, together with the obvious completion of the syllogism. It is safe to say that not a day passes in which any one fails of an opportunity to apply the principles set forth by Professor Dubois, and it is in the hope that the publication of his book may promote the seizing of these opportunities, as well as prove illuminating to some of the most prevalent problems of the practitioner, that the American edition has been produced. Thanks are due to the persevering labors of Mrs. Smith Ely Jelliffe, who provided the translation in large part, and of Miss Grace Goodale, who prepared the Index. SMITH ELY JELLIFFE. WILLIAM A. WHITE. New York, June 17, 1905. DR. DEJERINE'S PREFACE The work of Professor Dubois is that of a physician as well as of a psychologist who for a long time has perceived the important role played by psychotherapy in the treatment of the neuroses. At a period when, in spite of the works of Pinel and Lasegue, showing the necessity for the adoption of moral methods of treatment in the psychopathies, physicians persisted in treating the neuroses solely by physical methods, Dubois has had the merit of showing, in a series of publications, the primordial (fundamental), if not unique, role which is played in the treatment of psychoneuroses by what I should like to call psychic pedagogy — ^that is to say, the ree